Structure and magnetic properties of magnetically isotropic and anisotropic Nd–Fe–B permanent magnets prepared by spark plasma sintering technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spark plasma sintering technique had been applied to prepare bulk isotropic and anisotropic nanostructured Nd–Fe–B permanent magnets via hot pressing and subsequent hot deformation process. Influences of processing conditions and deformation height reduction on the structure and magnetic properties of the magnets were investigated. For the hot deformed magnet with 80% height reduction, XRD patterns of the anisotropic magnets show dominant (00l) diffraction peaks indicating evident c-axis crystallographic alignment in the magnet. Under the optimal processing conditions, the anisotropic magnet with 80% height reduction exhibits excellent magnetic properties as remanence (Br) of 1.492 T, coercive force (Hci) of 1004 kA/m, and the maximum energy product [(BH)max] of 400 kJ/m3, which are among the highest reported magnetic properties of nanostructured Nd–Fe–B permanent magnets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".