MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060161795 · doi:10.1109/cads.2013.6714252

A novel test strategy and fault-tolerant routing algorithm for NoC routers

2013· article· en· W2060161795 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRouterComputer scienceNetwork on a chipLatency (audio)Network packetComputer networkOne-armed routerRouting algorithmNetwork routingCore routerDeadlockRouting (electronic design automation)MetricsRouting protocolRouting tableDistributed computingEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a novel routing algorithm in order to avoid deadlock and packet dropping. In our proposed algorithm the network-on-chip (NoC) is capable of tolerating faults in presence of control faults in combinational parts of routers. In addition, by modifying the functionality of the router, the router is enabled to test its own, as well as the preceding router's functionality based on the routing algorithm, destination address and previous router's situation. Each router recognizes the faulty neighbor and announces it to successive routers. In this scheme no extra packets will be generated. We analyze the effects of our method on latency, power consumption and drop rate. Our experimental results illustrate that, fault coverage for routers can reach up to 100% with yet low power consumption and significant improvement in latency compared to the baseline approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207