MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060183677 · doi:10.1093/library/15.4.456

<i>The Library of the Sidneys of Penshurst Place circa 1665</i> . By G <scp>ermaine</scp> W <scp>arkentin</scp> , J <scp>oseph</scp> L. B <scp>lack</scp> and W <scp>illiam</scp> R. B <scp>owen</scp> . <i>The Library of the Sidneys of Penshurst Place circa 1665</i> . By WarkentinGermaineBlackJoseph L.BowenWilliam R.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2013. xiv, 406 pp. + ill. CAN $185.00. <scp>isbn</scp> 978 0 8020 4293 4.

2014· article· en· W2060183677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renae Satterley

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Library · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiptResidenceArt historyLibrary scienceOutreachClassicsArtHistorySociologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLawPolitical scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dust-jacket illustration forThe Library of the Sidneys of Penshurst Place depicts a view of Penshurst, the residence of the Sidney family for over 400 years, that has changed little over the centuries. This volume is the product of collaborative research spanning close to thirty years on the early-modern history of the Sidney family library. The project originated in 1967 when Germaine Warkentin was a graduate student, and she has seen the project through various technological and personnel changes. It is an informative work, admirably organized and structured. The research is exhaustive and scholarly without being pedantic, and it is a fascinating book to read. The book is mainly concerned with the early-modern Sidney family's library, starting from its origins in the 1540s and ending with its sale in 1743. The original manuscript library catalogue, part of archives deposited by William Sidney, Lord De L'Isle in 1984, forms the basis of the work. Unnoticed by scholars until the 1980s, the catalogue was created in 1652/3 by Gilbert Spencer, with entries added up to 1665. According to the catalogue, the library had approximately 4,927 volumes, although it omits some books, such as ‘receipt collections’ (p. 8) or other working volumes and some individual titles within multi-volume sets (e.g. entry 159r12, ‘Ramas de diverses pieces en 24 vol.’). It also omits most of the manuscripts, commonplace books, and personal papers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4260.220

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LibrarySame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207