Minimum ratio canceling is oracle polynomial for linear programming, but not strongly polynomial, even for networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper shows that the minimum ratio canceling algorithm (and a faster relaxed version) of Wallacher (1989) can be generalized to an algorithm for general linear programs with geometric convergence. This implies that when we have a negative cycle oracle, this algorithm will compute an optimal solution in (weakly) polynomial time. We then specialize the algorithm to linear programming on unimodular linear spaces, and to the minimum cost ow and (dual) tension problems. We construct instances proving that even in the network special cases the algorithm is not strongly polynomial. Keywords: negative cycle canceling algorithm, minimum ratio cycle, linear programming problem, unimodular linear space, minimum cost ow, minimum cost tension. 1 Introduction A popular class of algorithms for the minimum cost ow problem is the cycle canceling algorithms. This concept originates with Klein [11], and is based on the idea that pushing ow around negative-cost residual cycles will impr...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it