MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060355705 · doi:10.1504/ijica.2011.039593

Particle swarm optimisation with simple and efficient neighbourhood search strategies

2011· article· en· W2060355705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationNeighbourhood (mathematics)Computer scienceLocalityMathematical optimizationBenchmark (surveying)Simple (philosophy)Local search (optimization)Swarm behaviourAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel particle swarm optimiser (PSO) called PSO with simple and efficient neighbourhood search strategies (NSPSO), which employs one local and two global neighbourhood search strategies. By this way, one strong and two weak locality perturbation operators are embedded in the standard PSO. The NSPSO consists of two main steps. First, for each particle, three trail particles are generated by the mentioned three neighbourhood search strategies, respectively. Then, the best one among the three trail particles is selected to compete with the current particle, and the fitter one is accepted as a current particle. In order to verify the performance of NSPSO, it experimentally has been tested on 12 unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions. The results show that NPSO significantly outperforms other seven PSO variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it