MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060463109 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2010.5675179

Effective FPGA-based electric motor modeling with floating-point cores

2010· article· en· W2060463109 on OpenAlexaff
Tarek Ould‐Bachir, Jean‐Pierre David, Christian Dufour, Jean Bélanger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)Polytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceComputationFloating pointPoint (geometry)Real-time simulationEmbedded systemInduction motorVoltageEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simulation of electromechanical systems like motor drives often requires sub-microsecond calculation timesteps considering the fast dynamic of such systems and the high-switching frequency involved. Migrating computational load to an FPGA processor has proven to effectively meet the real-time simulation needs of such systems. However, many challenges still must be overcome before broad adoption of FPGA technology for real-time simulation applications occurs. In this paper, a general framework is presented for effective use of FPGA machine drive modeling when the state-space approach is used. Computations are performed in floating-point using commercially available arithmetic cores. Using the discussed framework guarantees that time steps well below 1 μs can be achieved. Two real-world applications examples are given in the paper: an FPGA-based implementation of a BLDC motor, and an FPGA-based implementation of an induction motor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207