MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060560013 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drp038

A robust a posteriori error estimate for hp-adaptive DG methods for convection-diffusion equations

2010· article· en· W2060560013 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConvection–diffusion equationEstimatorApplied mathematicsA priori and a posterioriPolygon meshNorm (philosophy)Galerkin methodDiscontinuous Galerkin methodAdaptive mesh refinementMathematical analysisFinite element methodGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a robust a posteriori error estimate for hp-adaptive discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of stationary convection–diffusion equations. We consider one-irregular meshes consisting of parallelograms. The estimate yields global upper and lower bounds of the errors measured in terms of the natural energy norm associated with the diffusion and a seminorm associated with the convection. The ratio of the constants in the upper and lower bounds is independent of the local mesh sizes and weakly dependent on the local polynomial degrees. Moreover, it is also independent of the magnitude of the Péclet number of the problem, and hence the estimate is fully robust for convection-dominated problems. We apply our estimator as an error indicator in an hp-adaptive refinement algorithm and illustrate its practical performance in a series of numerical examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it