MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060572307 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2006.259174

An efficient graph-based steiner tree heuristic for the global routing of macro cells

2006· article· en· W2060572307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Biological Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteiner tree problemMacroHeuristicComputer scienceTree (set theory)GraphRouting (electronic design automation)Theoretical computer scienceCombinatoricsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global routing of macro cells remains an important, but time-consuming step, in the VLSI design cycle. Macro cells are large, irregularly sized parameterized circuit modules that typically contain large numbers of terminals that must be interconnected. The interconnection pattern for each set of terminals (net) that must be connected is a Steiner tree, and the primary sub-problem in global routing of macro cells is to find a set of dissimilar, low-cost Steiner trees for each net that must be routed. In this paper, a two-phase algorithm is proposed for quickly constructing a diverse pool of Steiner trees for routing multi-terminal nets. In the first phase, a novel constructive algorithm, called Shrubbery, is used to grow high-quality Steiner trees to enter the pool. To ensure variety among pool members, a long-term memory and edge-weight perturbation strategy is employed to diversify the search when seeking for new solutions. Local search is used in the second phase, to further improve the quality of trees in the pool. Computational experiments performed on over 800 commonly used benchmarks show that the proposed algorithm is able to generate pools of optimal (or near-optimal) trees in a very small amount of time. Most importantly, the trees produced are highly dissimilar, allowing for numerous routing possibilities for each net. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it