MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2060703112 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.3147

Range expansion of <em> Ixodes scapularis</em> ticks and of <em> Borrelia burgdorferi</em> by migratory birds

2014· article· en· W2060703112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIxodes scapularisBorrelia burgdorferiLyme diseaseTickRange (aeronautics)BiologyEcologyTransmission (telecommunications)IxodesBorreliaZoologyIxodidaeVirologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have suggested that the risk of exposure to Lyme disease is emerging in Canada because of the expanding range of I. scapularis ticks. The wide geographic breeding range of I. scapularis-carrying migratory birds is consistent with the widespread geographical occurrence of I. scapularis in Canada. However, how important migratory birds from the United States are for the establishment and the stable endemic transmission cycle of Lyme disease in Canada remains an issue of theoretical challenge and practical significance. In this paper, we design and analyze a periodic model of differential equations with a forcing term modeling the annual bird migration to address the aforementioned issue. Our results show that ticks can establish in any migratory bird stopovers and breeding sites. Moreover, bird-transported ticks may increase the probability of B.burgdorferi establishment in a tick-endemic habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it