Grey-box modeling and control of HCCI engine emissions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time model based control of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engines faces a critical challenge of maintaining a perfect balance between model accuracy and computational load. In particular, currently available HCCI emissions models in the literature are highly computationally expensive for control applications. This paper develops a computationally efficient grey-box HCCI engine model for predicting Total Hydrocarbon (THC), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx). The grey-box model consists of a feed forward Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) model in combination with physical models for estimating combustion phasing and Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP). The emission model is experimentally validated over a large range of HCCI engine operation including 208 steady state test conditions. The validation results show that the grey-box model is able to predict NOx, CO, and THC with average relative errors less than 10%. Using a Genetic Algorithm optimization method along with the developed emission grey-box model, an optimum CA50 trajectory is obtained for every given load trajectory in order to minimize THC and CO emissions. A model-based controller is designed and tested on the grey-box virtual engine model for tracking IMEP and the optimum CA50 trajectories, while indirectly minimizing the engine emissions. Control results show that the developed grey-box model is of utility for real time HCCI control applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".