MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061378959 · doi:10.1386/ejac.25.3.189_1

Storytelling and cultural identity: Louise Erdrich's exploration of the German/American connection in The Master Butchers Singing Club

2007· article· en· W2061378959 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of American Culture · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanStorytellingSanityIdentity (music)SingingArtHistoryLiteratureArt historyAestheticsNarrativeLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand stories, one must understand the spirit of the stories and the spirit of the person and the family who is telling them. Above all, one must know oneself. For Louise Erdrich, the American writer of Mtis/Cree/Chippewa (also known as Anishinabe or Ojibwa) origin on her mother's side and German/ Jewish/Catholic heritage, on her father's side, this has meant a lifelong commitment to writing in order to maintain a sense of sanity and stability. For it is this mixed identity that continually confronts her with a sense of, as she describes it, unziemliches Verlangen, unseemly longing. Erdrich writes about the interaction between Natives and Europeans in her novels and as writer and storyteller she incorporates not one, but several cultural identities. In much of the research about Erdrich these German/American connections have been all but ignored. This article seeks to address that anomaly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it