MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2061956965 · doi:10.1002/gj.1196

Applications of digital outcrop models: two fluvial case studies from the Triassic Wolfville Fm., Canada and Oukaimeden Sandstone Fm., Morocco

2009· article· en· W2061956965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcropGeologyFluvialDigital dataChannel (broadcasting)Remote sensingLidarData miningComputer scienceGeomorphologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The application and benefits of employing digital outcrop models (DOMs) are discussed using two Triassic fluvial case studies to demonstrate data collection and integration methods. Developments in data analysis techniques are examined to demonstrate their utility for collecting meaningful and reliable statistical information needed to build realistic stochastic reservoir models. To establish a significant geostatistical dataset a large number of accurate observations are required. It is difficult to get the necessary statistics using subsurface data alone, due to the limited resolution and/or areal coverage of respectively seismic and well data. Outcrop studies are, therefore, commonly utilized to provide analogue statistical information (e.g. channel width, length, thickness and thickness vs. width ratio). Traditional data collection methods used in the field are however largely restricted to areas with (easy) physical access, or using remote observations with limited accuracy, such as photographic methods. Digital data collection techniques such as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and differential GPS allow more accurate measurements, as well as from previously inaccessible locations, to be taken of sedimentary architecture. The technique generates much larger volumes of measurements, as the area from which accurate data can be extracted is increased. This offers a more meaningful statistical dataset, hence reducing uncertainty in the final reservoir model. Both case studies, the Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation (OSF), Morocco and Wolfville Formation, Canada, are from Late Triassic braided fluvial systems. The OSF dataset has been used to illustrate how geometric information of channel width versus thickness relationships (W:T) are collected using a projection plane technique. The results show W:T variations between 3.49:1 in the Lower Oukaimeden member, 1.54:1 in the Middle Oukaimeden member and 3.75:1 in the Upper Oukaimeden member, demonstrating the observed architectural evolution of the fluvial system. The Wolfville Formation case study shows how DGPS in combination with LiDAR data has been used to more accurately map faults to obtain statistical information on fault orientation (NE–SW) and length (mean = 38.3 m and median = 18.2 m). Another applied analysis technique utilizes a facies classified point‐cloud to aid surface correlations between sedimentary logs and construct a log based correlation panel from which estimates of facies frequencies are derived. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it