MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062146540 · doi:10.1145/1178477.1178508

The future of video

2005· article· en· W2062146540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaVideo productionCinematographyQuality (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)High-definition televisionMovie theaterHigh-definition videoPresentation (obstetrics)Scale (ratio)Computer graphics (images)TelecommunicationsVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new flatscreen displays provide a high-quality platform for the presentation of the moving image. The Introduction of High-Definition Television (HDTV) will push video quality to higher levels. We will see unprecedented cinema-quality moving images available in our homes. These and other emergent video technologies will support the use of more complex visual narrative constructions and enable the utilization of high-resolution flatscreen panel displays as ambient "video paintings". This paper provides an outline of some of the emergent production techniques enabled by large-scale high-definition video display environments. It also discusses the need for a new generation of postproduction tools in order to realize the aesthetic possibilities of this new medium. Finally, the paper reviews our creative visual explorations in the development of an ambient video genre through a set of three video works.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207