MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062485877 · doi:10.1080/0740817x.2012.705452

Solving a stochastic facility location/fleet management problem with logic-based Benders' decomposition

2013· article· en· W2062485877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIIE Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenders' decompositionDecompositionFacility location problemFleet managementMathematical optimizationComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses a stochastic facility location and vehicle assignment problem in which customers are served by full return trips. The problem consists of simultaneously locating a set of facilities, determining the vehicle fleet size at each facility, and allocating customers to facilities and vehicles in the presence of random travel times. Such travel times can arise, for example, due to daily traffic patterns or weather-related disturbances. These various travel time conditions are considered as different scenarios with known probabilities. A stochastic programming with bounded penalties model is presented for the problem. In order to solve the problem, integer programming and two-level and three-level logic-based Benders’ decomposition models are proposed. Computational experiments demonstrate that the Benders’ models were able to substantially outperform the integer programming model in terms of both finding and verifying the optimal solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it