MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062604477 · doi:10.5006/1.3278509

Another Way to Think About the Critical Oxide Volume Fraction for the Internal-to-External Oxidation Transition?

2008· article· en· W2062604477 on OpenAlexafffund
Roger Newman, Fabio Scenini

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity Network of Excellence in Nuclear EngineeringUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsVolume fractionOxideInternal oxidationVolume (thermodynamics)Materials scienceMetallurgyThermodynamicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simple concepts derived from percolation theory are used to interpret the transition from internal-to-external selective oxidation in alloys. The analysis is most appropriate for relatively low temperatures, where lattice diffusion of the solute (more reactive element) cannot assist in the formation of an external oxide over any reasonable time scale. It is suggested that over a range of pO2 values, the transition will occur at a roughly constant alloy composition corresponding to a continuum percolation requirement for a nanoscale skeletal oxide formed just below the alloy surface. When this oxide has a sufficiently connected morphology, it provides a short-circuit transport path for the solute. Removal of compressive stress by movement of solvent to the surface is discussed. Predicted values of the critical solute concentration range from 10 at% to 16 at%. Experimental data on Alloy 600 (UNS N06600) oxidation are used to support aspects of the analysis, and to identify unresolved issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207