Economical Steel Plate Shear Walls for Low-Seismic Regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research on steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) and current design codes have focused principally on achieving highly ductile behavior through stringent detailing requirements. As such, the system is generally considered to be economical only in high-seismic regions. However, lower demands in other regions may permit the use of more economical options. This paper describes a proposed concept for SPSWs that meets the intent of capacity design, while greatly improving competitiveness in seismic regions where maximum ductility is not required. A large-scale, 2-story SPSW specimen was tested to evaluate the associated performance. The wall had standard double-angle beam-to-column shear connections and was tested under vertical gravity load concurrent with reversing lateral loads at each floor level. The specimen survived 25 lateral load cycles, 18 of which were in the inelastic range. The test results indicated that excellent performance can be expected in low-seismic regions, despite significantly reduced costs, compared with traditional designs. The shear wall showed stable performance at large lateral deformation ratios with high levels of ductility and energy dissipation capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".