MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062784138 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564584

Improved colored noise handling in Kalman Filter-based speech enhancement algorithms

2008· article· en· W2062784138 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColors of noiseKalman filterAutoregressive modelColoredSpeech enhancementAlgorithmComputer scienceNoise (video)White noiseFilter (signal processing)Fast Kalman filterSpeech recognitionMathematicsExtended Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceComputer visionStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a simple alternative to the traditional handling of autoregressive colored observation noise processes in Kalman filter-based speech enhancement algorithms. The method is entirely centered on a rewriting of the state-space equations describing the problem. The proposed approach decreases the dimension of the state vector and the amount of computations per iteration, and also naturally reduces to the white noise case when a zero-order autoregressive colored noise is chosen. In addition, from the multiple experiments conducted using several Kalman filter-based algorithms, it is found that the quality obtained with the new method, as measured by different speech quality measures, is equivalent and in some cases better. The simulations presented are based on both computer-generated and real-world colored noises, in stationary and nonstationary cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it