MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2062898766 · doi:10.1346/ccmn.2003.0510506

Crystal Structures of Biotite at High Temperatures and of Heat-Treated Biotite using Neutron Powder Diffraction

2003· article· lv· W2062898766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClays and Clay Minerals · 2003
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear materials and radiation effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyNeutron diffractionCrystal structureRietveld refinementBiotitePhysicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal structure of biotite-1 M from Bancroft, Ontario, with the formula: <mml:math xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mnf="http://cambridge.org/core/manifest" xmlns:cup="http://contentservices.cambridge.org" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:m="http://cambridge.org/core/metadata" xmlns:core="http://cambridge.org/core" xmlns:c="http://cambridge.org/core/content"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>K</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Na</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ca</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Mg</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Fe</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Mn</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Si</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Al</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ti</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>OH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> , was determined by Rietveld refinement using high-resolution neutron powder diffraction at in situ temperatures ranging from 20 to 900°C. The room-temperature structure of the samples heated to between 400 and 900°C using an electric furnace in air was also refined. The crystal structures were refined to an R P of 2.98 — 5.06% and R wp of 3.84–6.77%. For the in situ heating experiments in a vacuum, the unit-cell dimensions increased linearly to 600°C. The linear expansion coefficient for the c axis was 1.65 × 10 −5 °C −1 , while those for the a and b dimensions were 4.44 × 10 −6 °C −1 and 5.21 × 10 −6 °C −1 , respectively. Accordingly, the increase in the unit-cell volume up to 600 C occurred mainly along the c axis, resulting from the expansion in the K coordination sphere along that direction. Results for all K−O bonds were analyzed in terms of the lattice component and an inner component of the structural strain. The ditrigonal distortion decreased (3.76 at 20°C to 1.95 at 600°C) with temperature, because the shorter bonds expanded and the longer bonds contracted. The increase in the interlayer separation and the decrease in the interlayer octahedral flattening angle confirmed that the c -dominated expansion occurred in the interlayer region. In the case of the ex situ -heated samples, the cell dimensions decreased sharply at temperatures over 400 C. The octahedral sheet thickness and mean &lt; M −O&gt; distance decreased linearly due to oxidation of octahedral Fe. However, the interlayer separation and mean &lt;K−O&gt; distance decreased at temperatures over 400°C. At 400°C, dehydroxylation began to increase and interlayer regions became more constricted. The overall cell parameters decreased rapidly with increasing temperatures due to dehydroxylation. The large inner strain components in the K−O bonds also resulted in an increase in the considerable ditrigonal distortion (3.57° at 400°C to 6.15° at 900°C).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it