Visual bisection of freely-viewed asymmetrical stimuli
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When performing line bisection tasks, neurologically normal individuals exhibit leftward biases. Similarly, normals also exhibit leftward biases during judgements of brightness, numerosity, and size. However, when these same judgement stimuli are visually bisected, this results in rightward bisection biases. These apparently contradictory results are complicated by the fact that bisection tasks are typically performed using single stimuli, whereas judgements of brightness, numerosity, and size are performed on pairs of stimuli. The present study examined the effects of visual bisection on pairs of stimuli. A sample of 34 undergraduate psychology volunteers exhibited leftward biases when making judgements of brightness, numerosity, and size. However, these same participants did not exhibit leftward bisection biases with the same stimuli. Instead, overall rightward bisection errors were observed. These results indicate that although these two types of tasks elicit similar perceptual biases, they are probably the result of different perceptual mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it