MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063127809 · doi:10.2514/2.4990

Dynamics/Control of a Radio Telescope Receiver Supported by a Tethered Aerostat

2002· article· en· W2063127809 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio telescopeDynamics (music)Aerospace engineeringTelescopeComputer scienceRemote sensingPhysicsEngineeringGeologyAstronomyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian researchers have proposed a design for a new radio telescope consisting of an array of very large ree ectors. A largemultitethered aerostat will be used to support each ree ector’ s receiver. The length of each tether can be adjusted by ground-based winches, and active control is used to overcome the effects of wind turbulence on the aerostat. To aid in the system’ s mechanical and controller design, a computer model has been developed, including models of the tethers and the aerostat. Two types of aerostat have been considered: spherical and streamlined. A wind turbulence model is incorporated to provide disturbance to the system. Controllers are used to adjust the tether lengths based on feedback of the receiver’ s position. The model is used to optimize the control gains. We e nd that, with 50 kW available at each winch, it is possible to maintain the receiver’ s position within 85 cm of its desired location, even in the worst-case cone guration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it