MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063335236 · doi:10.1139/l08-078

Internal curing of mortars by lightweight aggregates and its effects on hydration

2008· article· en· W2063335236 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Properties and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi
KeywordsCuring (chemistry)CementitiousMortarMaterials scienceComposite materialShrinkageCement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the effects of lightweight aggregates (LWAs) on heat and degree of hydration in high-strength cementitious materials, in which natural pumice LWAs were used as water reservoirs to provide internal curing for mitigating autogenous deformation. Normal aggregates were substituted by LWAs at three different volume fractions, such as 8%, 16%, and 24% of total volume of mortars. The results show that as the amount of LWAs increased, the autogenous deformation significantly decreased, while the heat of hydration increased slightly. The cement particles can easily find water released from LWAs and consequently, the degree of hydration increased due to internal curing. The addition of LWAs caused a delay in the time to approximately reach the asymptotic value of the nonevaporable water content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it