The effect of drying and whole grain content on the pasting, physicochemical and qualitative properties of pasta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Drying is one of the most important stages in pasta production because of its influence on texture and colour. Whole grain pasta has been associated with greater cooking loss and softer texture. The objective of this research was to examine the impact of the drying profile and whole grain content on pasting and physicochemical properties of starch in macaroni and see how the qualitative properties of macaroni are affected. A flour × drying interaction was detected in pasting properties of the samples with differences observed in peak viscosity, peak time and final viscosity in whole grains following drying. Hot stage microscopy showed restricted granule swelling following treatment, reducing amylose leaching, which partly governs viscosity. DSC showed a significant increase in ALC formation upon treatment, which can also reduce leaching. While the interaction between these main effects was significant for cooking loss, firmness and adhesiveness measured instrumentally, differences between drying conditions for either textural attribute could not be detected using a trained panel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it