Optimal fineness ratio for minimum drag in large whales
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optimum fineness ratio (X = L/d, where L and d are body length and profile height, respectively) for minimum drag is about 4.5 and many fast swimming fish are characterized by values of this order. However, values for large whales that undergo extensive migrations (e.g., Balaenopteridae, Balaenidae, and Physeteridae) are as high as 8. A plot of fineness ratio versus mass (M) for different species of large whales shows that the optimal fineness ratio for minimum drag and therefore the minimum cost of transport increases slowly with increasing mass (X = 4M 0.06 ). Optimal fineness ratio was determined from a simple hydromechanical model based on the sum of friction and pressure drag on an equivalent cylindrical body, which indicate a small positive dependence (0.11) of optimal fineness ratio for minimum drag with increasing body mass, suggesting an adaptation for reducing the energy cost of swimming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it