MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063580548 · doi:10.1177/152660280100800506

Evaluation of Patient Selection Guidelines for Endoluminal AAA Repair with the Zenith Stent-Graft: The Australasian Experience

2001· article· en· W2063580548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endovascular Therapy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeEndovascular aneurysm repairAbdominal aortic aneurysmStentSurgeryRadiologyAneurysmOcclusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To review the patient selection guidelines for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the Zenith Endovascular Graft and establish an order of importance for each criterion. METHODS: The Zenith Endovascular Graft Research Database was interrogated for information on 238 patients (209 men; mean age 74.9 +/- 0.9 years, range 50-94) treated with a Zenith bifurcated graft from 1994 to 1998. The common complications of endoluminal AAA repair (endoleak, migration, graft occlusion, graft kinking, conversion, and deployment failure) were analyzed to determine any associations with selection criteria. RESULTS: By 1998, 69% of endograft patients did not meet the recommended guidelines; however, primary and secondary aneurysm exclusion rates were 87% and 94%, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 13.4 months (interquartile range 2.8-24.0), 38 (16%) patients developed 28 (74%) early and 10 (26%) late type-I endoleaks. The endoleak rate in necks < or = 10 mm long was 57% (8/14). Endoleak was associated with a neck contour change >3 mm (p = 0.003) and neck length <20 mm (p = 0.045). The risk of proximal endoleak was 4 times greater if at least one of the proximal neck guidelines was breached; combined guideline deviations of "contour change and large diameter" (p = 0.0004), "contour change and short length" (p = 0.006), "large diameter and short length" (p = 0.01), and "contour change and angle" (p = 0.03) also increased the risk of endoleak. Endograft migration was seen in 10 (4.2%) cases; only neck diameter >28 mm (p = 0.0024) was associated with this complication. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal neck contour, length, and diameter are the most important criteria in terms of endoleak development. Breaching the proximal neck length criterion resulted in a 4-fold increase in endoleak, and combined deviations from the guidelines multiplied the effect. Necks < or = 10 mm long are unsuitable for the standard Zenith graft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it