MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063661101 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.255002

Reduction of Electron Heating in the Low-Frequency Anomalous-Skin-Effect Regime

2003· article· en· W2063661101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkin effectPlasmaAtomic physicsElectromagnetic electron wavePhysicsElectronInductively coupled plasmaCollision frequencyAbsorption (acoustics)Magnetic fieldRadio frequencyRF power amplifierPlasma oscillationMaterials scienceOpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that electron thermal motion in the anomalous-skin-effect regime of rf plasma discharges leads to enhancement of rf power absorption by plasma due to the resonant electron-wave interaction, which is a main mechanism of plasma heating in a typical inductively coupled plasma discharge. In this Letter we show, however, that the rf power absorption may be strongly reduced (compared to the Ohmic value) at low frequencies due to the electron thermal motion; an even further reduction occurs due to the nonlinear effects of the rf magnetic field. The absorption reduction occurs for omega<nu<v(th)/delta (omega is a driving frequency of rf wave, nu is the collision frequency, v(th) is the thermal velocity, and delta is characteristic skin depth of the wave) and may be observed in low pressure inductive plasmas driven at low frequency and in a dc plasma with strong field inhomogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it