MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of Sun-Protective Practices of Organ Transplant Recipients

2004· article· en· W2064490883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSkin cancerSun protectionIncidence (geometry)PhototypeSun exposureOrgan transplantationCancerSurgeryDermatologyInternal medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incidence, morbidity and mortality of skin cancer are markedly increased in organ transplant recipients. Efforts aimed at reducing sun exposure through sun avoidance, sunscreens and sun-protective clothing are the most effective means to reduce the risk of skin cancer. We evaluated the sun-protective behaviors of 205 transplant recipients. Twenty-three percent of transplant patients continued to seek a tan. Thirty percent of patients did not use sunscreens, and of those patients who did, less than 5% were committed to using them daily. Thirty-seven percent of patients frequently wore hats and 39% of patients frequently wore additional clothing to block the sun. When data were stratified according to patient age, gender or skin phototype, we identified preferences for specific sun-protective methods. These data strongly suggest that many transplant recipients do not use adequate sun protection. Further study of strategies to encourage the use of sun protection among transplant patients is needed to reduce the incidence of skin cancer. The incidence, morbidity and mortality of skin cancer are markedly increased in organ transplant recipients. Efforts aimed at reducing sun exposure through sun avoidance, sunscreens and sun-protective clothing are the most effective means to reduce the risk of skin cancer. We evaluated the sun-protective behaviors of 205 transplant recipients. Twenty-three percent of transplant patients continued to seek a tan. Thirty percent of patients did not use sunscreens, and of those patients who did, less than 5% were committed to using them daily. Thirty-seven percent of patients frequently wore hats and 39% of patients frequently wore additional clothing to block the sun. When data were stratified according to patient age, gender or skin phototype, we identified preferences for specific sun-protective methods. These data strongly suggest that many transplant recipients do not use adequate sun protection. Further study of strategies to encourage the use of sun protection among transplant patients is needed to reduce the incidence of skin cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it