MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seasonal reproductive cycle of pike, Esox lucius L., from the River Danube

2002· article· en· W2064753043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ichthyology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPikeBiologyVitellogenesisEsoxFecundityOocyteReproductive cycleZoologyEcologyAnimal scienceReproductionFisheryEmbryoPopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seasonal changes in ovaries and testes of the pike, sampled in the Danube (at 1163 and 1175 km) were analysed in this research. According to the presence of developing and resting oocytes in histological sections of pike ovaries sampled during August, it is possible to determine which female will be sexually mature the following spring. Active vitellogenesis starts in September (with oocyte diameters of 514 ± 54 μm and 453 ± 68 μm, at the upstream and downstream locality, respectively), at which time the differences between the developing and resting oocytes are even more obvious. Active spermatogenesis starts in September and lasts for 2 months, and by November primarily spermatozoa can be seen in histological sections. The reproductive score points to differences in samples from the two localities that can be explained by the differing characteristics of the habitat. Values of absolute fecundity (AF) ranged from 524 to 123 896 eggs, and the mean value of relative fecundity (RF) was 40.4 ± 12.5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it