A hierarchical reinforcement learning based control architecture for semi-autonomous rescue robots in cluttered environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teleoperated rescue robots designed to explore disaster scenes and find victims face serious limitations due to the cluttered nature of the environments as well as the rescue operators becoming stressed and disoriented in these scenes. An alternative to using teleoperated control is to develop fully autonomous controllers for rescue robots. However, these robots are also not capable of traversing these complex unpredictable environments. In order to address the limitations of both teleoperation and fully autonomous robotic control for urban search and rescue (USAR) environments, semi-autonomous controllers can be developed to allow task sharing and cooperation between a human operator and a robot. In this paper, a unique Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL) based semi-autonomous control architecture is proposed. The architecture provides the robot with the ability to learn and make decisions regarding which rescue tasks, exploration or victim identification, should be carried out at a given time and whether an autonomous robot or a human controlled robot can perform these tasks more quickly and efficiently without compromising the safety of the victims, rescue workers and the rescue robot. Preliminary experiments presented here evaluate the performance of the proposed HRL control approach for a rescue robot in an unknown cluttered USAR environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".