MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064790537 · doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.197

In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada

2006· article· en· W2064790537 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
J. S. Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Warwick
KeywordsCoalGeologyCitationMining engineeringIconLibrary scienceArchaeologyGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 01, 2006 In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada J.S. Bell J.S. Bell Sigma H Consultants Ltd., P.O. Box 2797, Invermere, BC V0A 1K0 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2006) 54 (3): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.197 Article history received: 15 Nov 2005 accepted: 19 Jun 2006 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation J.S. Bell; In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2006;; 54 (3): 197–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.197 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract Laboratory testing has shown that the permeability of clastic rocks is related to confining stress. The same relationships have been demonstrated for coal. Production rates of coal bed methane have been shown to be inversely proportional to stress magnitude in Australia and the United States. Preferred fluid flow axes aligned with SHmax, the larger horizontal principal stress, have been documented. Relevant previous studies are reviewed and discussed. The findings are then applied to central and southern Alberta and specifically to a horizon approximating the MacKay coals of the Upper Cretaceous Belly River Formation. Methods for determining the vertical stress, SV, and the smaller horizontal stress, SHmin are described and a data base is assembled from published data concerning micro-fracture and mini-fracture instantaneous shut in pressures, fracture breakdown pressures and leak-off pressures. This data base is used to generate a series of maps which are interpreted using relationships established outside Western Canada to establish optimum locations for coal bed methane productivity at the selected stratigraphic horizon. The paper ends with a plea to acquire more local primary data relating in-situ stress to the permeability and productivity of subsurface coal seams. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207