MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064829172 · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6441389x

Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Following Application of Pig Slurry for the 19th Consecutive Year I. Carbon Dioxide Fluxes and Microbial Biomass Carbon

2000· article· en· W2064829172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science Society of America Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en AgroenvironnementAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsSlurryDecompositionSoil waterManureCarbon dioxideBiomass (ecology)Animal scienceChemistryEnvironmental chemistryNitrogenEnvironmental scienceSoil carbonTotal organic carbonAgronomySoil scienceEnvironmental engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agricultural soils often receive annual applications of manure for long periods. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of 19 consecutive years of pig ( Sus scrofa ) slurry (PS) application on CO 2 emissions and soil microbial biomass. Soil temperature, soil moisture, and extractable soil C were also determined to explain the variations in CO 2 emissions and soil microbial biomass. Long‐term (19 yr) treatments were 60 (PS60) and 120 Mg ha −1 yr −1 (PS120) of pig slurry and a control receiving mineral fertilizers at a dose of 150 kg ha −1 yr −1 each of N, P 2 O 5 , and K 2 O. Very high CO 2 emissions (up to 1.5 mg CO 2 m −2 s −1 ) occurred during the first 2 d after PS application. Following that peak, decomposition of PS was rapid, with one‐half the total emissions occurring during the first week after slurry application. The rapid initial decomposition was exponential and was attributed to the decomposition of the labile fraction of the slurry C. The second phase was linear and much slower and probably involved more recalcitrant C material. Cumulative annual decomposition was proportional to the application rate, with 769 and 1658 kg C ha −1 lost from the 60 and 120 Mg ha −1 doses, respectively. Pig slurry application caused a rapid increase in soil microbial biomass (from ≈100 to up to 370 mg C kg −1 soil), which coincided with a peak in the concentration of extractable C and in CO 2 emissions. Field estimates of the microbial specific respiratory activity suggested that the difference in soil respiration between the two slurry treatments was due to differences in the size of the induced microbial biomass rather than to differences in specific activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it