Quantification of the Effects of Shattering on Airborne Ice Particle Measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ice particle shattering poses a serious problem to the airborne characterization of ice cloud microstructure. Shattered ice fragments may contaminate particle measurements, resulting in artificially high concentrations of small ice. The ubiquitous observation of small ice particles has been debated over the last three decades. The present work is focused on the study of the effect of shattering based on the results of the Airborne Icing Instrumentation Evaluation (AIIE) experiment flight campaign. Quantitative characterization of the shattering effect was studied by comparing measurements from pairs of identical probes, one modified to mitigate shattering using tips designed for this study (K-tips) and the other in the standard manufacturer’s configuration. The study focused on three probes: the forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP), the optical array probe (OAP-2DC), and the cloud imaging probe (CIP). It has been shown that the overestimation errors of the number concentration in size distributions measured by 2D probes increase with decreasing size, mainly affecting particles smaller than approximately 500 μm. It was found that shattering artifacts may increase measured particle number concentration by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. However, the associated increase of the extinction coefficient and ice water content derived from 2D data is estimated at only 20%–30%. Existing antishattering algorithms alone are incapable of filtering out all shattering artifacts from OAP-2DC and CIP measurements. FSSP measurements can be completely dominated by shattering artifacts, and it is not recommended to use this instrument for measurements in ice clouds, except in special circumstances. Because of the large impact of shattering on ice measurements, the historical data collected by FSSP and OAP-2DC should be reexamined by the cloud physics community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it