MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065193748 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2012.2195666

Enhancing Spatial Resolution of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Sensor's Intrinsic Keystone Distortion

2012· article· en· W2065193748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
FundersDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsSubpixel renderingHyperspectral imagingImage resolutionComputer visionCube (algebra)Computer scienceData cubeArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingImage fusionDistortion (music)Sensor fusionFull spectral imagingPixelProjection (relational algebra)Spatial analysisImage (mathematics)GeologyAlgorithmData miningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a novel technology that can enhance the spatial resolution of hyperspectral data cube without using any additional images, as would be the case in image fusion. The technology exploits interband spatial misregistration or distortion (often referred to as “keystone”) of the sensor that acquired the data cube and uses it as additional information to increase the spatial resolution of the data cube. Three methods have been developed to derive subpixel-shifted images from the data cube itself in exploiting the sensor's intrinsic characteristics. Two schemes were proposed to organize the derived subpixel-shifted images before being integrated into the high-resolution image using the iterative-back-projection fusion. Experimental results show that the technology can enhance the spatial resolution in the cross-track direction of hyperspectral data cubes by a factor of two.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it