MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065458980 · doi:10.1002/ppap.201200028

In Situ Thermometry in Noble Gas Dielectric Barrier Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure

2012· article· en· W2065458980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAtmospheric pressureGlow dischargeDielectric barrier dischargeDielectricMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Noble gasInstrumentation (computer programming)ElectrodePlasmaThermocoupleChemistryAtomic physicsComposite materialOptoelectronicsMeteorologyPhysicsEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Atmospheric pressure (AP) dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) are increasingly used to treat thermally‐sensitive materials. Reliable measurements of the kinetic gas temperature, T , are therefore of capital importance. Spectroscopically determined rotational temperatures, T rot , are often tacitly assumed to be equal to T . Here, we measured T with fibre‐optic instrumentation that is a priori immune towards high voltages and high‐frequency electromagnetic fields generally encountered in plasmas. Finding T rot > T in AP glow discharge (APGD) DBDs in He and Ne, we believe that T rot ≈ T only during the short (≈ µs) current peaks that characterize APGD. Therefore, T represents the time‐averaged gas temperature; calorimetric measurements using a thermocouple buried in an electrode support this view. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it