MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2065684845 · doi:10.1109/icc.2013.6655576

Traffic offloading techniques in two-tier femtocell networks

2013· article· en· W2065684845 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemtocellComputer scienceComputer networkCellular networkWireless networkSoftware deploymentPower controlWirelessPower (physics)TelecommunicationsBase stationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the scarcity of the wireless spectrum along with the ever increasing number of cellular wireless users and the associated drastic increase in the data traffic demand, femtocells are envisioned to provide fast, flexible, cost-efficient, and customer driven solutions to offload users from the congested macro access network and enhance the overall system performance. To control offloading and to achieve the required balance of users and traffic served by each network tier, we quantify offloading and discuss different techniques that can be used to offload users from the macro access network to the femto access network, namely, offloading via power control, offloading via femtocell deployment and offloading via biasing. In this paper, we quantify offloading when users connect to the network entity that provides the strongest instantaneous signal power in a Nakagami-m fading environment. To this end, we discuss the merits and drawbacks of each of the offloading techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207