MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Near‐Term Organic Mine Countermeasures Ship (NMCM): Ship Conversion Feasibility Study

2001· article· en· W2066240526 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNaval Engineers Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Strategy and Technology
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersNaval Air Systems CommandNaval Sea Systems CommandUnited States Marine Corps
KeywordsInterimBattleEngineeringPaceTerm (time)Marine engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The recent proliferation of regional conflicts and the shift in naval operational theaters from the open ocean to the littoral environment has accentuated the danger of asymmetric threats to U.S. forces. One of the more effective of these threats has been waterborne mines. The historical approach to a mine threat has involved special purpose systems that are very effective, but slow to respond to developing crises. The accelerated pace of modern and future operations calls for a mine countermeasures (MCM) system that can rapidly respond to changing operational conditions. This study evaluates the feasibility of converting FFG 7 class frigates into MCM platforms that can deploy with battle groups to provide instantly available MCM capability. This conversion would be an interim solution, until a new platform can be developed, so it is called the Near‐Term Mine Countermeasures Ship (NMCM). The study determined that such a conversion would be feasible, with an estimated cost of $67.3 million per ship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it