MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DISCRETE-TIME OPTIMAL CONTROL OF NONHOLONOMIC MOBILE ROBOT FORMATIONS USING LINEARLY PARAMETERIZED NEURAL NETWORKS

2011· article· en· W2066268309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkParameterized complexityController (irrigation)Computer scienceOptimal controlDiscrete time and continuous timeMobile robotLyapunov stabilityNonlinear systemNonholonomic systemKinematicsLyapunov functionDynamic programmingStability (learning theory)RobotMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the infinite horizon optimal tracking control problem is solved online and forward-in-time for leader follower based formation control of nonholonomic mobile robots. Using the back-stepping approach and the kinematic controller developed in our previous work, the dynamical controller inputs for the robots are approximated from nonlinear optimal control techniques to track the designed control velocities. The proposed adaptive dynamic programming approach uses neural networks (NNs) to solve the optimal formation control problem in discrete-time in the presence of unknown internal dynamics and a known control coefficient matrix. All NNs are tuned online using novel weight update laws, and the stability of the entire formation is demonstrated using Lyapunov methods. Numerical simulations are also provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it