MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066291849 · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.044

Three-and-a-half Decades of Progress in Monitoring Soils and Soil Hydraulic Properties

2013· article· en· W2066291849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Environmental Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, DavisOregon State UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Soil waterEnvironmental scienceWork (physics)Remote sensingCivil engineeringHydrology (agriculture)EngineeringSoil scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article will focus on the evolution of soil water monitoring and determination of soil hydraulic properties with emphasis on large-scale soil-plant-atmosphere (SPA) experiments, beginning with the lead author's participation in this work in 1976 at University of California, Davis and evolving to current experiments involving the co-authors. Experiments to be highlighted include the HAPEX-MOBILHY (France, 1986), HAPEX-Sahel (Niger, 1992), NASA BOREAS (Canada, 1994-96), to the current NASA AirMOSS project (2011-15). This article will demonstrate sample data from a wide range of technology from neutron probe, to capacitance probes and other dielectric sensors, to the principle for the P-band radar in the current NASA AirMOSS project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it