MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2066411476 · doi:10.1177/0266666014240818

Information and Development Symposium

2001· article· en· W2066411476 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Development · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicICT in Developing Communities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrassrootsCommissionIndigenousPublic relationsCivil societyInformation technologyPolitical scienceKnowledge managementSociologyLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary report on a Symposium on Information and Development, held at the Economic Commission for Af rica (ECA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 7–10 May 2001. The Symposium was a collaborative venture of Oxfam Canada and two Ethiopian organizations, Illubabor Community Library Network and Mekrez Reading Association. The purpose was to recognize, consolidate, celebrate and enlarge the experience of grassroots structures engaged in the delivery of information services at community level, as part of a broader goal of establishing a civil society culture and supporting human development processes. The Symposium addressed three themes: ‘Indigenous Knowledge and External Knowledge: Finding the Balance’; ‘Creating Information Products and Delivering Information Services to Rural Communities’; ‘Using Information Technology to Create and Deliver Information Services to Rural Areas’. The Symposium gave the participants many ideas to implement in their own communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it