DuRT: Dual RSSI Trend Based Localization for Wireless Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Localization is a key issue in wireless sensor networks. The geographical location of sensors is important information that is required in sensor network operations such as target detection, monitoring, and rescue. These methods are classified into two categories, namely range-based and range-free. Range-based localizations achieve high location accuracy by using specific hardware or using absolute received signal strength indicator (RSSI) values, whereas range-free approaches obtain location estimates with lower accuracy. Because of the hardware and energy constraints in sensor networks, RSSI offers a convenient method to find the position of sensor nodes. However, in the presence of channel noise, fading, and attenuation, it is not possible to estimate the actual location. In this paper, we propose an RSSI-based localization scheme that considers the trend of RSSI values obtained from beacons to estimate the position of sensor nodes. Through applying polynomial modeling on the relationship between received RSSI and distance, we are able to locate the maximum RSSI point on the anchor trajectory. Using two such trajectories, the sensor position can be determined by calculating the intersection point of perpendiculars passing through the maximum RSSI point on each trajectory. In addition, we devised schemes to improve the localization method to perform under a variety of cases such as single trajectory, unavailability of RSSI trends, and so. The advantage of our scheme is that it does not rely on absolute RSSI values and hence, can be applied in dynamic environments. In simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed localization scheme achieves higher location accuracy compared with existing localization approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".