MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067033896 · doi:10.1177/1750698013501361

Remembering arrivals of refugees by boat in a Canadian context

2013· article· en· W2067033896 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemory Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityNewspaperContext (archaeology)RefugeeSecuritizationNova scotiaHistoryMedia studiesTourismCollective memorySociologyEvent (particle physics)GriefPolitical scienceCriminologyAdvertisingLawEthnologyPsychologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 12 July 1987, 174 people traveled from Rotterdam to Charlesville, Nova Scotia, on the Amelie in search of asylum. In Canadian national newspapers, their arrival was immediately turned into a crisis of securitization, which is common practice for such events. Conversely, local reports portrayed this event as a critical moment when regional Canadian identity was performed through commonly understood and commonly practiced all-inclusive hospitality. This article will look at how collective memories were produced and circulated on various levels in press reports, with a focus on the way local memories and local press reports supported international views of ideal Canadian humanitarianism and hospitality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it