MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067038916 · doi:10.1002/rob.1031

Causal approximate inversion for control of structurally flexible manipulators using nonlinear inner–outer factorization

2001· article· en· W2067038916 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Robotic Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)FactorizationNonlinear systemMathematicsInverse dynamicsInverseRiccati equationComputer scienceMathematical analysisAlgorithmControl (management)Differential equationGeometryClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligenceKinematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A control scheme for flexible‐link manipulators is advanced which is based on the notion of nonlinear inner–outer factorization. It is well known that the inverse of the forward dynamics map from joint torques to manipulator tip motion is noncausal and cannot be implemented in conjunction with real‐time path planning. The methods used here determine causal approximations for the inverse dynamics using the inverse of the outer (stable and minimum phase) factor and a static approximation for the inverse of the inner (lossless but nonminimum phase) factor. The Hamilton–Jacobi equation that arises is approximated by a state‐dependent Riccati equation at each time step. The factorization procedure yields the corresponding joint trajectories which can serve as reference trajectories for closing joint‐based feedback loops. Experimental results from a planar three‐link manipulator with two flexible links demonstrate the efficacy of the procedure. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it