MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067283391 · doi:10.1029/1998rs002133

Characterization of auroral radar power spectra and autocorrelation functions

2000· article· en· W2067283391 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutocorrelationSpectral densityMaximum entropy spectral estimationSpectral lineRadarParametric statisticsDoppler effectComputational physicsAutocorrelation techniqueBackscatter (email)PhysicsGaussianPower (physics)Statistical physicsMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunicationsPrinciple of maximum entropy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar backscatter is a commonly used tool for studying plasma instabilities in the auroral E region. Analysis of the received signals typically involves moments of the scattered power spectrum such as total power, mean Doppler shift, and spectral width; in some cases the spectral asymmetry may also be of interest. This paper presents the steps required to estimate spectral moments directly from the autocorrelation function, and some advantages and limitations of working in the lag domain are discussed. Recent measurements of auroral spectra at UHF (440 and 933 MHz) are used to motivate the discussion and as test cases. The utility of parametric models is also studied with an emphasis on determining whether spectra are more nearly Gaussian or Lorentzian. A model autocorrelation function is introduced, with spectral characteristics similar to a Voigt distribution but a more convenient functional form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it