MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067283391 · doi:10.1029/1998rs002133

Characterization of auroral radar power spectra and autocorrelation functions

2000· article· en· W2067283391 on OpenAlexaff
B. J. Jackel

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutocorrelationSpectral densityMaximum entropy spectral estimationSpectral lineRadarParametric statisticsDoppler effectComputational physicsAutocorrelation techniqueBackscatter (email)PhysicsGaussianPower (physics)Statistical physicsMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsTelecommunicationsPrinciple of maximum entropy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radar backscatter is a commonly used tool for studying plasma instabilities in the auroral E region. Analysis of the received signals typically involves moments of the scattered power spectrum such as total power, mean Doppler shift, and spectral width; in some cases the spectral asymmetry may also be of interest. This paper presents the steps required to estimate spectral moments directly from the autocorrelation function, and some advantages and limitations of working in the lag domain are discussed. Recent measurements of auroral spectra at UHF (440 and 933 MHz) are used to motivate the discussion and as test cases. The utility of parametric models is also studied with an emphasis on determining whether spectra are more nearly Gaussian or Lorentzian. A model autocorrelation function is introduced, with spectral characteristics similar to a Voigt distribution but a more convenient functional form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadio ScienceSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207