MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067416253 · doi:10.1353/nin.2003.0012

Baseball and Borders: The Diffusion of Baseball into Mexican and Canadian-American Borderland Regions, 1885-1911

2003· article· en· W2067416253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryEliteFrontierQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic historyPolitical scienceHistoryDevelopment economicsGeographyEconomyPoliticsEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the John A. Macdonald government in Canada and the regime of Porfirio Diaz in Mexico followed similar development strategies. Both countries encouraged domestic industry, made substantial investments in railways, and extended their state's influence over hinterland territories and aboriginal peoples. In Mexico's case this meant a northward gaze toward the American border; in Canada's it meant looking westward. Modernization brought American investment to both countries, especially in the resource industries. It also facilitated the diffusion of baseball into borderland regions. Despite the similar development strategies employed by the two countries in the years before World War I, however, baseball more readily permeated the Canadian-American boundary than it did the Mexican-American frontier. THE DIFFUSION MODEL In recent years Allen Guttmann, Joseph Arbena, and others have suggested a diffusion model in which sporting culture radiates the more developed nations outward to the rest of the world, entering host cultures at the elite level, before descending through the social order to the working class and urban poor. (1) As a general theory, the diffusion model helps chart the expansion of sporting culture, especially in the nineteenth century. In Mexico, for example, the Diaz regime's interest in modernization brought with it a new interest in fashionable leisure, the bicycle to baseball games, pursuits initially taken up by members of the elite. In Canada the British team sports--cricket, soccer, and rugby--supplanted earlier forms of leisure that were more attached to rural life. Despite the hopes of an Anglo-Saxon elite that British sporting practices would create respectability and a deeper allegiance to the empire, the practices were often resisted, especially in Quebec, and quickly gave way to such No rth American sports as lacrosse, hockey, and baseball. (2) This paper addresses the nature of the diffusion process as it relates to baseball in the Mexican and Canadian borderlands 1880 to 1910. It asks a simple question: how did borders affect the diffusion process? In addressing this question the paper reflects upon how the two borderlands were constructed and imagined, what they shared, and how they differed. Baseball established itself in the southwestern borderlands during the 1880s, at a time when Hispanic and Indian peoples confronted an expanding Anglo culture characterized by commercial agriculture, land speculation, mineral exploitation, railway development, and the veneration of free white labor and private property. With baseball already established as the pastime, its westward expansion symbolized the coming of a new order associated with capitalist enterprise and entrepreneurial values. By the end of the decade the game was being played Brownsville/Matamoros, Laredo/Nuevo Laredo, and El Paso/Juarez on the Texas-Mexican border, to Douglas/Agua Prieto and Bisbee/Cananea on the Arizona/Sonora border, and Tucson and Yuma in Arizona as far west as San Diego/Tijuana. As it came to the region the national pastime remained essentially an Anglo game. It increasingly embodied what David Roediger, Ruth Frankenberg, Valerie Babb, and others describe as whiteness, a white-centric assumption of privilege from which white people look at ourselves, at others, and at society (3) and which justified driving African Americans out of the ranks of professional baseball all over North America during the 1880s. (4) At the same time, baseball was thriving in Minnesota, North Dakota, and Montana and across the Canadian border in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. As in the Southwest, this region was being transformed by railway construction and settlement. In addition, the process through which native peoples were being dispossessed and in which whiteness was being privileged was nearing completion. Recently Sheila McManus has analyzed the uneven transition of Blackfoot country into the Alberta-Montana borderlands the 1860s to the 1890s. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it