MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067439384 · doi:10.1002/marc.201000786

Continuous Controlled Radical Polymerization of Methyl Acrylate in a Copper Tubular Reactor

2011· article· en· W2067439384 on OpenAlexaff
Nicky Chan, Michael F. Cunningham, Robin A. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerizationMethyl acrylateRadical polymerizationChain transferCopperPolymerMaterials sciencePolymer chemistrySolution polymerizationReversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizationAcrylateChemical engineeringLiving polymerizationChemistryCopolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of copper tubing as both the reactor and as a catalyst source is demonstrated for continuous controlled radical polymerization of methyl acrylate at ambient temperature and at low solvent content of 30%. The high surface area provided by the copper walls mediates the reaction via the single electron transfer-living radical polymerization (SET-LRP) mechanism. The polymerizations proceeded quickly, reaching 67% conversion at a residence time of 16 min. Ligand concentration could also be reduced without a sharp drop in polymerization rate, demonstrating the potential for decreased raw material and post-process purification costs. Chain extension experiments conducted using synthesized polymer showed high livingness. The combination of living polymer produced at high polymerization rates at ambient temperature and low volatile organic solvent content demonstrate the potential of a copper reactor for scale up of SET-LRP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207