MétaCan
← all works

The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research

2014· article· en· 3,763 citations· W2067652191 on OpenAlex· 10.1188/14.onf.545-547

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Abstract

Triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods or data sources in qualitative research to develop a comprehensive understanding of phenomena (Patton, 1999). Triangulation also has been viewed as a qualitative research strategy to test validity through the convergence of information from different sources. Denzin (1978) and Patton (1999) identified four types of triangulation: (a) method triangulation, (b) investigator triangulation, (c) theory triangulation, and (d) data source triangulation. The current article will present the four types of triangulation followed by a discussion of the use of focus groups (FGs) and in-depth individual (IDI) interviews as an example of data source triangulation in qualitative inquiry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Oncology nursing forum
Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Field
Social Sciences
Canadian institutions
McMaster University
Funders
Keywords
TriangulationQualitative researchMedicineMathematicsSociologySocial scienceGeometry
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes