MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067721388 · doi:10.1080/02331930211987

Probabilistic Solutions to Optimal Control Problems

2002· article· en· W2067721388 on OpenAlexafffund
Mario Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenueOptimization · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsConverseProbabilistic logicOptimal controlBrownian motionDynamic programmingDiffusion processContinuationSection (typography)Nonlinear systemWiener processApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisGeometryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let ( x 1 ( t ), x 2 ( t )) be a controlled two-dimensional diffusion process. The problem of minimizing, or maximizing, the time spent by ( x 1 ( t ), x 2 ( t )) in a given subset of 2 is solved, in two particular instances, by transforming the optimal control problems into purely probabilistic problems. In Section 2 , ( x 1 ( t ), x 2 ( t )) is a two-dimensional Wiener process and the optimal control is obtained by transforming a nonlinear dynamic programming equation into the Kolmogorov backward equation for a two-dimensional geometric Brownian motion. In Section 3 , the converse problem is solved. The problem of finding the maximal instantaneous reward that we can give for survival in the continuation region is also treated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptimizationSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207