Conversion Efficiency of Radiation Damage Profiles into Hydrogen-Related Donor Profiles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By introducing radiation damage and hydrogen and successively annealing with low thermal budgets, hydrogen-related donors are created in oxygen-lean silicon. Hydrogen-related donor profiles are induced in float-zone silicon by implanting hydrogen and/or helium and successive annealing with or without additional hydrogen introduction by a hydrogen plasma. The efficiency of the conversion of the radiation-induced damage into the hydrogen-related donors differs in dependence of the method of damage and hydrogen introduction. In proton implanted samples, the ultimate introduction rate of the donors is significantly lower than it is in helium and hydrogen co-implanted samples. Furthermore, the depth distribution of the hydrogen-related donors shows a deviance from the simulated distribution of the radiation damage induced by proton implantation not seen in case of helium-induced damage. The change in doping efficiency is discussed in respect to the hydrogen content in the different experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it