MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067856487 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.261

NIS01-1: An Efficient Key Management Scheme for Heterogeneous Sensor Networks

2006· article· en· W2067856487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceKey managementOverhead (engineering)Scheme (mathematics)Key (lock)Computer networkDistributed computingKey distribution in wireless sensor networksHomogeneousComputer securityTelecommunicationsWireless networkWirelessEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security is critical for sensor networks deployed in hostile environments. Previous research on sensor network security mainly considers homogeneous sensor networks, i.e., all sensor nodes have the same capabilities. Many security schemes designed for homogeneous sensor networks suffer from high communication/computation overhead, and/or large storage requirement. We adopt a heterogeneous sensor network (HSN) model to overcome these problems. In this paper, we present an efficient asymmetric pre-distribution (AP) key management scheme that takes advantage of the powerful high-end sensors (H-sensors) in an HSN. The AP scheme utilizes the large storage of H-sensors and pre-load each H-sensor with a relatively large number of keys. The AP scheme dramatically reduces the total storage space for key pre-distribution. The performance evaluation and security analysis show that the AP scheme provides better security than existing key management schemes, while achieving significant reduction on sensor storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it