MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067923321 · doi:10.2475/05.2010.03

Hydrothermal dolomite in the Timiskaming outlier, central Canadian Shield: Proxy for Late Ordovician tectonic activity

2010· article· en· W2067923321 on OpenAlexaffabout
George R. Dix, Sanjeev Sharma, Ihsan S. Al‐Aasm, Mario Coniglio, Robert L. Linnen, John Riva, A. Achab

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorCarleton UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomiteGeologyOrdovicianDiagenesisCarbonateGeochemistryDolomitizationPaleozoicMineralogyAuthigenicHydrothermal circulationPaleontologyFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Timiskaming Paleozoic outlier on the central Canadian Shield preserves a thin distal portion of the once extensive Taconic deep-water shale succession that extended across eastern Laurentia. Within this succession, a thin (5 cm) lithic and phosphatic sandstone occurs a few meters above the top of the buried shallow-water carbonate platform, and contains abundant (40-60%) euhedral dolomite, rare fluorite, pyrite-cemented shale microbreccia, and crystal mosaics of subhedral dolomite with pyritic veinlets. The dolomite formed local cement, and precipitated very near the sediment-water interface as illustrated by a relatively uncompacted sandstone framework and a 3-dimensional fabric of clay particles trapped by dolomite growth. The majority of dolomite has planar crystal faces, with ferroan (4.1 ± 0.3 mol% FeCO~3~) crystal cores and non-ferroan (0.9 ± 0.2 mol% FeCO~3~) rims. Fluid inclusions, too small (\<2 μm) for reliable microthermic analysis, are mostly liquid, which, in keeping with interpreted near-surface diagenesis, as well as temperature-controlled dolomite-crystal roughening models, may indicate that formation temperatures were no more than ∼60 to 80°C. δ^13^C~PDB~ values (∼1.2 ‰) are similar to a Late Ordovician seawater composition, but δ^18^O~PDB~ values (−4.8 to −5.2 ‰) are too negative compared to the expected values for contemporary deep-marine dolomite. Combining the regional paleoceanographic framework with diagenetic constraints and revised models for Late Ordovician seawater temperature and δ^18^O compositions, the dolomite is interpreted to be a proxy for a low-temperature (at least ∼50°C) hydrothermal anomaly near the sediment-water interface. Fragments of shale microbreccia, pyrite veinlets, and subhedral dolomite, along with the region9s structural history, allow speculation that this event coincided with local reactivation of a Precambrian fault, part of an ancestral fault system now manifest regionally by an extension of the Ottawa-Bonnechère Graben. Late Ordovician craton-interior tectonism, in a region previously considered tectonically stable at this time, is defined by local response of inherited Precambrian structure driven by, but distal to, Taconic orogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of ScienceSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207