MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067975082 · doi:10.3102/0013189x035007032

School Commercialism and the Fate of Public Schooling: What’s “Good” for America?

2006· article· en· W2067975082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Researcher · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommercialismAssertionDemocracySociologyPublic goodIdeal (ethics)LawEconomicsPolitical economyPolitical scienceNeoclassical economicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

n 1952 General Motors president Charles Erwin Wilson famously pronounced, What's good for the country is good for General Motors, and what's good for General Motors is good for the country. This outright equation of commercial institutions with national identity, of corporate good with the American good, is the central dynamic explored in both Alex Molnar's School Commercialism: From Democratic Ideal to Market Commodity (2005) and Kenneth J. Saltman's The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling and the Assault on Public Education (2005). However, two major changes have occurred since Wilson's assertion a half-century ago: Many corporations have grown to unprecedented size, the largest overshadowing the economies of most nations (Lodge & Wilson, 2006); and, as these books demonstrate, the trend has spread from car making to education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it